Join Now Bar G Strategy Free Workshop & Download CET 2025 Actual Papers – Register Now!

CET 2025 Slot 3 Actual Question paper MAH MMS MBA CET 2025

MBA CET 2025

,

MBA CET 2025 Question paper

Download MAH MBA CET 2025 Actual Papers with solutions by Registering here

MBA CET 2025 Slot 3 Full Paper Analysis | Score vs Percentile | Sectional Breakdown & Difficulty

The MBA CET 2025 Slot 3, held in April, turned out to be a paper of fluctuating difficulty, testing both accuracy and speed. Compared to Slot 1 and Slot 2, Slot 3 had slightly lengthier Reading Comprehensions, confusing Logical Reasoning caselets, and a time-consuming Quant section.

This analysis offers a section-wise breakdown of all topics, level of difficulty, expected good attempts, and an accurate score vs percentile estimate for MBA CET 2025 Slot 3 — ideal for those preparing for MBA CET 2026 or evaluating JBIMS/SIMSREE admission chances.


Logical Reasoning (LR): Tricky and Dominant

The LR section, as with all CET slots, comprised the largest chunk — close to 70–75 questions. It included:

  • Team-based puzzles & arrangements (Q33–Q38): Candidates had to organize engineers and developers across days — complex and time-consuming.
  • Statement-Assumption, Syllogisms & Conclusions (Q52–Q56): Included multi-layer logic.
  • Coding-Decoding (Q39–Q41): Some symbolic, others alphanumeric.
  • Direction & Blood Relations (Q30–Q32): Slightly twisted formats.

The LR caselets required strong visualization skills. For instance, the team puzzle involved matching days, tasks, and departments — a common trap for CET candidates. Time was the biggest challenge here, not just difficulty.

Difficulty Level: Moderate to Tough
Good Attempt: 48–55 questions
Score Benchmark (99%ile): ~125
Ideal Time Allocation: 75 minutes


Abstract Reasoning (AR): Familiar Patterns with Slight Twists

Abstract Reasoning in Slot 3 was manageable. With around 25 questions, it included:

  • Mirror and Water Images
  • Embedded Figures & Series Completion
  • Odd-One-Out and Pattern Matching

Some figures were rotated versions of the same shape in different sequences, requiring attention to symmetry. Unlike Slot 2, Slot 3 had slightly less direct visuals and demanded quicker elimination.

Difficulty Level: Easy to Moderate
Good Attempt: 20–22
Accuracy Potential: 85%+
Time Required: 20 minutes
Score Benchmark: 18–20


Quantitative Aptitude (QA): Lengthy Calculations

Quant in Slot 3 was one of the most time-draining sections of this year’s paper. With approximately 50 questions, students faced a mix of arithmetic, algebra, and DI-based questions:

  • SI-CI, Averages, Profit-Loss: Q15, Q16, Q21, Q24
  • Geometry & Mensuration: Q18, Q25 – especially a cube painting question that was confusing
  • Time, Speed & Distance: Q26, Q30 – mixed variables and unit conversion
  • Data Interpretation Sets: Table-based DI and a bar graph set were complex and required close reading

Unlike Slot 1, where quant was mixed, or Slot 2, where logic-based math dominated, Slot 3 included multi-step calculations, which could derail timing.

Difficulty Level: Moderate to Tough
Good Attempt: 35–38 questions
Score Benchmark: 40–45
Time Required: 60 minutes


Verbal Ability (VA): RC-Heavy and Grammar-Based

The Verbal section of Slot 3 was loaded with RCs, with 3 passages:

  • RC 1 (Q57–Q61): Ethical dilemma in AI
  • RC 2 (Q68–Q72): Education policy in developing nations
  • RC 3 (Q85–Q89): Story-based — easier than others

There was also a mix of:

  • Error Spotting & Sentence Correction (Q73–Q76, Q95–Q97)
  • Para-Jumbles (Q91–Q94)
  • Vocabulary-Based Fill-in-the-Blanks (Q77–Q84)

RCs were dense and required time. While vocab was manageable, some grammar rules tested fine distinctions (e.g., parallelism, subject-verb agreement).

Difficulty Level: Moderate
Good Attempt: 36–42 questions
Score Benchmark: 35–40
Time Allocation: 40 minutes


MBA CET 2025 Slot 3 – Score vs Percentile Estimate

Based on analysis and feedback:

Raw Score RangeEstimated PercentileRemarks
140+99.9+Top 0.1% scorers
130–13999.7+JBIMS safe zone
120–12999.0 – 99.6Target SIMSREE, Welingkar
110–11997 – 99PUMBA, Chetana-level
100–10995 – 97Tier-2 cutoff level
<100<95May miss Top 10

Slot 3 vs Slot 1 & 2 – Comparative Table

SectionSlot 1Slot 2Slot 3
Logical ReasoningManageable puzzlesLengthy DI & caseletsMore abstract & confusing
Abstract ReasoningEasy classic patternsSlightly tougher visualsFamiliar but required speed
Quant AptitudeMixed with logicConcept-based DI-heavyCalculation-heavy, long
Verbal AbilityVocabulary-basedGrammar + 2 RCs3 RCs + error spotting
Overall DifficultyModerateModerate to ToughModerate, time-consuming

Key Takeaways for MBA CET 2026 Aspirants

  • Puzzle Mastery: Strengthen puzzle-solving under pressure. Solve 10–12 puzzles daily.
  • RC Practice: Focus on dense RCs. Time your RC sessions.
  • Visual Reasoning: Abstract Reasoning remains a scoring area — practice shape series and mirror image recognition.
  • DI + Arithmetic: Prepare for mixed-type questions, especially time/distance and profit-loss with logic twists.

SEO Keywords Included:

MBA CET Paper Difficulty Slot-Wise

MBA CET 2025 Slot 3 Analysis

MBA CET Slot 3 Score vs Percentile

MBA CET 2025 Logical Reasoning Questions

MBA CET Abstract Reasoning Solutions

MBA CET Verbal Ability RC Questions

CET Slot 3 Paper Review and Solution

MBA CET 2026 Preparation Strategy

JBIMS Cutoff 2025 Expected

CET Score vs Percentile Comparison 2025

Join us MBA CET 2025